8/9/2023 0 Comments Hot asian modelPolitics Conservative justices may end affirmative action in college admissions - and beyondĭoes the pursuit of admissions diversity by Harvard and the University of North Carolina violate civil rights laws? Supreme Court to decide. Indeed, the model minority stereotype has long been used to undermine demands for equality for all. But research shows that those who view Asian Americans through that lens are more likely to view other people of color as lacking a work ethic. The stereotype of hard work and smarts can provide an advantage in some instances. Importantly, Asian Americans experience both positive and negative forms of bias in college admissions. We would expect to see statistically significant negative associations if intentional discrimination was at work here.Īsian Americans, like all nonwhite students, do face implicit bias. The 2013-14 Harvard Interviewer Handbook highlights “introspection” and “the reflective introvert” as a “future leader.” Statistical models show positive, though not statistically significant, associations between admissions and Asian American identity for Asian American females and Asian Americans from California. That would be tragic.īlum’s suit makes much of the fact that the small numbers of Asian American applications his team reviewed contained comments reinforcing the “model minority” stereotype, portraying Asian Americans as passive nerds lacking leadership with phrases like “very quiet” and “quiet and strong.” But “very quiet” and “quiet and strong” were comments that appeared in the files of Black, Latino and white applicant files as well. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s 2003 prediction that affirmative action college admissions would only last 25 more years may come true if the current court has its way. Opinion Nicholas Goldberg: The affirmative action calamity brewing at the Supreme Court Espenshade himself has said that the data do not establish racial bias. Why? Because the analysis does not include key elements in admissions files, including letters of recommendation and essays. Based on data collected in the 1990s, their research does not provide an actual score differential between groups. The SAT score differentials often cited are based on a study by Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Radford that, when viewed without context, is quite misleading. Park, a scholar of higher education, shows in “ Race on Campus: Debunking Myths with Data” why this assertion is wrong. Still, the claim that Asian Americans have to score “ 140 points” more than white students to get into highly selective colleges has gone viral. In fact, that is why the University of California no longer considers the SAT in admissions. If the Supreme Court ends the program, first-generation students like me will continue to face inequities when it comes to higher education.Ĭonsidering factors beyond test scores does not amount to intentional discrimination targeting Asian Americans, but is an important acknowledgment that standardized tests reflect economic inequalities and are flawed indicators of merit. Opinion Op-Ed: I’m an Asian American Harvard grad. Asian Americans have the highest education and incomes of any racial group, though there are significant variations in income and parental education among Asian Americans, with poverty rates among Hmong and Burmese Americans at more than 25%. Standardized test scores are more highly associated with parental education and family income than with college success or completion. But the SAT has never been fair and is rooted in racism, developed by a racist eugenicist, Carl Brigham. The faulty evidence for these myths rests in large part on the assumption that tests like the SAT are the best and fairest measures of merit. Potent myths about admissions circulate within and outside Asian American communities: “Asian Americans have to score higher than other students to get in” and “Asian Americans shouldn’t check the Asian box on applications.” These myths are often endorsed by college admissions advisors and accepted by parents and students, though not a single Asian American student has testified that they faced discrimination in the high profile Harvard case. But we just don’t see an Asian American penalty in college admissions. A big part of our research has been to identify anti-Asian discrimination, so we understand how charges that Asian Americans are held to a higher standard in college admissions might feel like another instance of anti-Asian bias. The Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action, focusing on whether Harvard’s consideration of race in admissions intentionally discriminates against Asian Americans, is expected this month.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |